Medallion Development Sdn Bhd v Bukit Kiara Development Sdn Bhd (Court of Appeal) [2015] 4 MLJ 350 / [2015] 1 AMR 537
Justin was the counsel for the appellant/defendant. Dissatisfied with the High Court’s decision, the Appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal and the High Court’s decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal. In this case, there was a Sale and Purchase Agreement of the development land and a Supplementary Agreement to deal with part of the purchase price of RM4 million to be paid in kind by contra of 2 units of property. The Supplementary Agreement provides that should the Purchaser (Appellant) fail to deliver the condominium units to the vendor (Respondent) within 36 months, the Appellant is liable to pay interest to the Respondent. The Appellant did not deliver the units to the Respondent within 36 months and the Respondent rescinded the agreement and demanded for payment of RM4 million. In this case, the Court of Appeal held that the respondent was only entitled to demand for the payment of interest for late delivery of condominium units, but not entitled to rescind the supplementary agreement purely because the appellant was not able to meet the deadline. A mere failure to meet the deadline of 36 month cannot in law amount to “total failure of consideration”. The appeal was decided in favour of the appellant/defendant.