Mohamed Sam Bin Sailan v Syarikat Asal Construction Sdn Bhd (High Court) [2014] 10 MLJ 293 & [2014] 2 MLRH 608
Justin was the counsel for Syarikat Asal Construction (the Defendant). The Plaintiff contended that in order for the Defendant to maintain its bumiputra status, the Defendant had purportedly re-appointed the Plaintiff after his retirement as a Director without his consent and knowledge and the Defendant had been forging the Plaintiff’s signature. The Plaintiff therefore claimed that he was entitled to 37% from the profit earned from the relevant projects. After a full trial, the Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim and inter-alia held that the Plaintiff failed to prove forgery without any handwriting expert evidence and further, since the Plaintiff disclaimed and disagree he was a shareholder, he could not claim for any profits in the form of dividends. The case involved the Plaintiff claiming for damages as well as profits and claimed the Defendant forged his signature to re-elect him as director of the company. The High Court after a Full Trial found in favour of the Defendant, dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim due to the lack of evidence on the side of the Plaintiff.