Merais Sdn Bhd v Lai King Lung (Practising as an advocate and solicitor under the name and style of Messrs Chris Lai, Yap & Partners Advocates and Solicitors) & Anor [2019] 2 AMR 761; [2019] 7 CLJ 1 (Court of Appeal)
[Law on retrospective sanction from the Liquidator to commence proceedings on behalf of a wound-up company] Justin was counsel for the Respondents in this case who applied to strike out the Appeal on the basis that no proper sanction has been obtained by the Respondent/Appellant to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal dismissed the application and amongst others held that :- (i)With the presence of s 236 of the Companies Act, it is the liquidator who has the authority to bring or defend any action or proceedings in court. The term “bringing” must necessarily include continuing with any action or proceedings already brought or commenced and any such action or proceedings must also extend to the conduct and continuation of appeals. (ii)The Official Receiver as the liquidator of the appellant has the necessary authority to consider and grant a sanction which is effective on a date other than the date it was made i.e. retrospective sanction. Bearing in mind that the Official Receiver had already granted the necessary sanction, the respondents’ application thus is without merit and must be dismissed.